Bluegrass Consulting: Blueblog

Monday: 08 February

Is less more?

It’s been just over three years since the wide spread emergence of Facebook and there seems to be four types of users in my mind….. PD*26690008

  1. The facebooker who signed up and couldn’t really figure it out so left it dormant
  2. The facebooker who puts every gritty detail of their life online, with photos (often self taken photos) going up every Monday morning to document the weekend’s activities, these people usually want people to look at their profile
  3. The facebooker who is starting to ‘de-friend’ because they realize their facebook has grown to become their online bedroom and don’t want everyone snooping around in their personal photos
  4. The facebooker who uses facebook completely unawares of privacy issues and wouldn’t know whether their profile is available for anyone to see or if its restricted

Facebook culling is now a popular catch phrase as people add more and more personal information to their pages and are feeling the need to limit access to that information…

Linkedin has seen a similar phenomenon; with many users believing it is quite rude to ‘connect’ to someone who you hardly know.  Check out Art Petty’s blog (very funny) about social networking etiquette, he knows what I’m talking about!

What type of facebooker are you? Have you considered overhauling your privacy settings?

Bookmark and Share
Thursday: 04 February

Anonymity – What is it worth to you?

anonymousSome people love to use Avatars instead of their real photo online, others like to make up Alias names (or their alter egos) and then some just like to stay plain ‘Anonymous’.

You may have heard recently that South Australian Attorney-General Michael Atkinson tried to ban online comments about the South Australian Election unless they were accompanied by their full name and postcode to verify the comment as one from a real person, not a party hack. He’s since had to do a back flip just 24 hours later due to the outrage it caused among bloggers and the like.

I can see why some people like to retain their anonymity such as political bloggers & pollsters, corporate whistleblowers or staff complaining about their company or work conditions or Trolls who go around seeking trouble! Being anonymous allows us to basically view our opinions and battle others without fear of retribution or personal judgement…

I’m glad Attorney General Michael Atkinson did a back flip on this, after all we are in a day and age where you have to be careful what you say online for fear of being sacked or sued which certainly can impede on a person’s freedom of speech.

Being anonymous allows people to post opinions on behalf of themselves, without paranoid or logical concerns about what will happen to them professionally or personally if they speak up on an issue.

What do you think? Do you comment on news sites etc with your real name? Do you think it’s important we are able to remain ‘anonymous’ in public debate if we so choose?

Annabey

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday: 02 February

This blog is dedicated to people who think twitter is for idiots

I recently went to a friend’s place for dinner (they had all of their work mates over) we shared many glasses of wine and some how got onto the topic of twitter and “how stupid it is” and how “it’s for people with too much time on their hands”.

Granted, it can be used to waste time, I actually find myself gradually using it less and also using it for different reasons to what I used to use it for. That being said, I believe Twitter has changed the way we access News forever… and we owe it a lot of credit for that at least.

So here are two ways (I thought I’d keep this short and sweet) that you can use twitter… for those who still think it’s a stupid website for people with too much time on their hands!

1. News

How it works
• People from all over the world can upload photos, videos and comments instantly, documenting on the ground accounts, experiences or opinions
• By using a hashtag (like for example #iranelection) users can see all comments, images and videos relating specifically to this subject, LIVE, as they happen

Drawbacks
• As the news comes in from witness accounts that are not verified sources information can be wrong or biased

Advantages
• Large amounts of information can be used to develop a more balanced perspective
• Information is instant (I.e. Faster than traditional news outlets)
• Twitter is virtually impossible to censor – in places such as Iran or China where the government have strict controls on news content, twitter is a very powerful information source

2. Finding answers/recommendations

How it works
• I have found answers to some techy problems I’ve had before and I’ve often ‘background checked’ a company or asked for referrals
• Only works if you have followers that have expertise/are located in your area and the desire to answer your question

Drawbacks
• Your followers might just recommend their shoddy mate

Advantages
• You can get the answer to those niggling questions almost instantly

What do you think? Waste of time or useful tool? Drop me a comment

Annabey

Bookmark and Share
Monday: 01 February

The ETS… to be, or not to be?

The opposition has made it clear - “NO ETS”.

tonyabbott1

So, in another classic example of political acrobatics, it would appear that Penny Wong has done a 180 on her choice of negotiating partners.

On the 22nd of December last year… some 40 days ago, the Climate Change Minister ruled out negotiating with the Greens to get the ETS through.

pennywong1

And now it would appear those comments aren’t so fixed in stone after all…

Today, Penny Wong will meet with the Greens Deputy Leader to try and nut out a solution for the ETS.

wong-milne

I wonder what will come of it… - Will we see the Government committing to a 40% reduction by 2020 that the greens were touting last year?

Unlikely… but surely there will have to be a compromise… the question however is… What will it be….??

CO2 Emissions

Bookmark and Share
Thursday: 14 January

Google (FOI) VS China (Censorship)

As a communications professional and the daughter of an artist, I am very passionate about freedom of information and expression without censorship so I felt compelled to add to the plethora of people talking about Google’s problems in China.

googlechina

I’m so happy that Google are making a stand in China by not folding to the Chinese Government’s demands on internet censorship. It will be interesting to see how this will unfold as Google are now operating illegally and it is predicted they will likely be forced out of the country.

Hillary Clinton issued a statement about the stalemate, saying “We have been briefed by Google on these allegations, which raise very serious concerns and questions. We look to the Chinese government for an explanation. The ability to operate with confidence in cyberspace is critical in a modern society and economy.”

I’m not sure you will get an explanation from the Chinese Government Hillary….

It really is a bold move by Google who may be forced to lay off 600 workers and relinquish their estimated 36% share of one of the worlds largest and fastest growing economies - handing it over to their competitor Baidu, who currently have the estimated majority 58% market share. Then again, Google do have a substantial portion of the market share globally!

So I guess this is just a quick hat tip to Google for taking a stand on such an important human rights issue, despite the likely loss for their bottom line.

Annabey

Bookmark and Share
Friday: 08 January

What did come of COP 15??

cop15_logo

In the words of Ban Ki-Moon - the summit just “could not end in failure”. Why? Well the concerns for most surrounding the success of the summit lay directly at the heart of international law and international negotiation… the basis and structure for the United Nations.

With the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Kyoto Protocol and the Bali Action Plan all still treaties and all still in effect, the “Copenhagen Accord” is merely a piece of paper that tells the world… “We haven’t wasted your tax-payer dollars… no, really… we promise!”

Political will, national promises, economic direction and public pressure just wasn’t enough to overcome the key issue that many nations had moving into Copenhagen… National Sovereignty.

And the final outcome of the summit seems to reflect that very point.  Despite many nations coming together forging a sense of cooperation and collaboration, national sovereignty remains supreme. All nations coming together in unity is one thing… and despite everyone’s best intentions, I really cant see how binding agreements with threat of financial penalty and legal action can be made collectively with all the world cheering along, especially on such a diverse and complex issue such as Climate Change!

There have been no quantified targets for emission reduction. Even the 50% by 2050 that was in early drafts couldn’t make it through the grueling negotiations. The action plan as it currently stands is that industrialised countries will inform the UNFCCC secretariat by 31 January, the extent to which they will cut their emissions after 2012 (when the current phase of Kyoto runs out). The emerging economies or developing nations will tell the UNFCCC what they plan to do to control their emissions. However… no one will be legally bound to any commitment.

climate-change-2

The reference to transparency in the text I guess is something significant, because what it means is that for the first time ever, actions by countries can be globally assessed for all to see. However, there is no verification anywhere of the actions undertaken in the smaller nations of the developing world… not unless they are paid for by the developed world.

And finally… there is no detail at all on any of the elements within the accord. There is a reference to the target of limiting global warming to 2C above pre-industrial temperatures, as well as the need for quantified action by both developed and developing countries. Great… BUT how will this target be achieved… your guess is as good as mine.

I guess really we will have to wait for the review of progress… in 2015.

climate-change1

What WAS actually achieved…? Well… see below -” The Carbon Cost of Copenhagen

Bookmark and Share
Friday: 08 January

The Carbon Cost of Copenhagen

16,500 delegates from 192 countries, 5,000 journos and 40,000 eco-campaigners amounting to over 40,500 tonnes of carbon dioxide, (roughly the same as the carbon emissions of Morocco in 2006). The organisers laid 900 kilometers of computer cable and 50,000 square miles of carpet. More than 200,000 meals were served and visitors busily sipped over 200,000 cups of coffee.

COP 15

Cartoon by Paul Thomas (UK Daily Mail 08/12/09)

Australia sent 114 delegates to the conference (a few more than Britain’s 71 delegates).

114 people traveling to Copenhagen amounts to around 1817 tonnes of carbon emissions (or 2500 peoples annual emissions in Malawi… ouch!).

Thoughts? Comments?

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday: 09 December

Bringing Energy and Enthusiasm to NSW…

Our enthusiastic new leader!

Well, well, well… you can’t say that no one saw it coming (Blueblog 16 Nov 2009).

Behind deposed Finance, Infrastructure, Ports and Waterways Minister, Joe Tripodi’s tears on Nov 15 just after he was dumped by the then NSW Premier Nathan Rees, was a furious, tactical and vengeful factional warlord - ready to take matters in his own hands… with a little help from fellow warrior - Eddie Obeid.

It took less than three weeks to mount the spill that cut the man (who Tripodi and Obeid installed as Premier only the year before), down and put him in the corner while 47 out of 68 Labor MP’s orderly lined up behind their faithful and stuck the knife in - much like the scene from the movie Flying High no doubt.

With Nathan gone, in swings A.B.N. - (Anyone But Nathan)… Frank Sartor, Kristina Keneally, I don’t think it really mattered - certainly not to the ALP State office. It was just simply time for Nathan to go.

Much like Tony Abbott, as the “ideological love child” of John Howard and Bronwyn Bishop, ascended to greatness as Federal Opposition Leader two days before… the “factional love child” of Tripodi and Obeid emerges as the victor in the NSW Government Party Room - All hail Premier Kristina Keneally!

What does this mean to the people of NSW?

  • A Cabinet reshuffle of the reshuffle the month before… (It really is hard to keep track of who’s who in the zoo).
  • I’d say a bit of money being spent on stationery reprints and office signage.
  • Maybe a boom in the elocution training business, by way of lessons for the new leader, to try and smooth out that Ohioan accent and perhaps give her a bit more of a ‘dinky di’ feel that will appeal to the people?
  • Some white-anting from the discarded former leader, Mr Rees?

So other than the Prime Minister being slightly annoyed (… understatement?) and a mental flash-image of watching CNN or Fox News as you tune into Channel 7, 9 or 10 each night… not a lot has really happened!

One good thing that has come out of all of this, is the fact that Kristina and Carmel now lead the first two-woman executive in the country… that is a move for equality, I guess.

However, I’m going to go out on a limb and say - I doubt that this point was at the forefront of ALP Honourable Members’ minds in casting their votes.

What are your thoughts? Comments?

Bookmark and Share
Friday: 20 November

The Kings English S.O.S.

To Blog?

This could be a little weird to read in a blog… but I was watching an episode of ‘Californication’ the other day - and I stumbled across this fantastic quote…
For those who don’t know the show - this extract is a quote from an author speaking on a radio about his new job as a ‘blog writer’. He says:

“People… they don’t write anymore - they blog. Instead of talking, they text, no punctuation, no grammar: LOL this and LMFAO that. You know, it just seems to me it’s just a bunch of stupid people pseudo-communicating with a bunch of other stupid people in a proto-language that resembles more what cavemen used to speak than the King’s English.”

Now I have to agree. There are some people out there who think that by smashing a few thoughts or ideas on a keyboard and posting it on the web - they are indeed opening the lines of communication in a significantly more profound and diverse way the oldies of the previous generations would ever have dreamed they would be able to do.

I guess this school of thought is somewhat true. Instead of the good old telegram, telex, letter, telephone call, or chit-chat over coffee or lunch - all of which (except the telephone) take at least a marginal amount of effort, thought or forward planning to get going… - Today - we can simply text, blog, chat, tweet and status update all day to our hearts content, and we don’t even really need to think about it. I guess it also effectively gets the message (whatever it may be) out there and across for the all of your mates to see!

But - in doing this, what are we actually doing for the English language, or indeed for our refined and defined (…some more than others) interpersonal communication skills?

Another question: How long has it been since you pulled out a blank piece of paper and wrote a letter to someone, using correct language, diction, grammar and spelling? No spell-check or “fragment consider revising”?

Now, I’m not judging anyone - nor am I saying that it really matters when the last time you partook in this archaic method of communication actually was… but for many, many, many years this was the ultimate method of communication.

Even when the Fax machine was born… you still needed something written on paper in order for the ’state-of-the-art’ facsimile technology to do its bit.

If the technological means of communication today, namely email, blogging and tweeting simply enhance our ability to “traditionally” interact and communicate… I say bring it on! - It opens up the doors and multiplies the contact points one thousand fold and allows all of us to refine our command and mastering of the English language!

However, if we are indeed destroying the traditional means of interaction and communication by sitting at a desk, on a train or in a car “updating” the world through LOL, BRB, LMFAO, ROFL, and whatever other acronyms there are out there, through blogs and quirky-funny one liners, never actually having to spell a word, or for that matter know how to use that little thing you need to use when making one of those little smiling faces,  I ask you world… what is happening to the skills the ancients once mastered?

I guess more importantly I ask - do they in fact matter anymore?

Do we need to know how to write, to spell or to punctuate?

(NOTE: Any pedantic, high-school English teacher out there that notices any spelling, grammatical, punctuation or factual errors in this piece of literature - are to be reminded that this is in fact a blog… and is thus exempt from English language usage rules and regulations)

Semicolon, dash, close-parenthesis…
Nathan.

PS. If you ever get stuck understanding the new world lingo - check this out… it may help!

Bookmark and Share
Thursday: 19 November

Flash Mobs!

No – It’s not a mob of people who show you what’s behind their trench coat!

You might have heard of them before, they have been around since 2003 – The ‘official’ (Wikipedia) definition of a flash mob is:

“a large group of people who assemble suddenly in a public place, perform an unusual action for a brief time, then quickly disperse. The term flash mob is generally applied only to gatherings organized via telecommunications, social media, or viral emails.”

Here are some of my favourite flash mobs:

DANCES:

My Favourite – Bondi Beach

More:

MUSICALS & MORE FUNNY STUFF

Pillow Fight, San Francisco

More:

FREEZES:

Central Station in New York

More:

Are you in the loop on up coming flashmobs? Have you been in one before? Let me know, drop a comment

Bookmark and Share